Difference between revisions of "Talk:Xavier"

From FreddyHouse
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
It would be nice if you would leave it that he left after having a child. There are so many rumours (pure fiction) and it is very upsetting for me to read Toms comment. Especially now after him leaving FH so long ago that we have a second (extremely young) child.
 
It would be nice if you would leave it that he left after having a child. There are so many rumours (pure fiction) and it is very upsetting for me to read Toms comment. Especially now after him leaving FH so long ago that we have a second (extremely young) child.
 +
 +
I'm with Bym to be honest. Having harsh/mocking articles about existing, active, members is one thing perhaps but I honestly don't think this is the place to drag up that argument all over again. I'm happy for there to be an objective historical note along lines of ‘Xavier was subject to some controversy blah blah’ but this is not the place to get into opinionated speculation.
 +
 +
--[[User:Shovel|Shovel]]

Revision as of 19:37, 6 August 2006

Well...which version to leave before we have to lock it?

It would be nice if you would leave it that he left after having a child. There are so many rumours (pure fiction) and it is very upsetting for me to read Toms comment. Especially now after him leaving FH so long ago that we have a second (extremely young) child.

I'm with Bym to be honest. Having harsh/mocking articles about existing, active, members is one thing perhaps but I honestly don't think this is the place to drag up that argument all over again. I'm happy for there to be an objective historical note along lines of ‘Xavier was subject to some controversy blah blah’ but this is not the place to get into opinionated speculation.

--Shovel